Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 1988No. 01-87-00469-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EVANS, Chief Justice.

A jury convicted the appellant of theft, and the court assessed his punishment at 10 years confinement, probated.

In his sole point of error, the appellant contends that his confession was inadmissible because it was obtained as a result of his illegal detention and in violation of his fourth amendment rights. See Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963). In considering this point of error, we must first determine whether the appellant was detained within the meaning of the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution; if…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Christopher Cancino Calamaco v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  2. Kendrae Shondell Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  3. Nicholas Vickery v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API