Legal Opinion
Calhoun v. McHugh
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided March 4, 2014No. Case No. 1:11-CV-4134-VEHPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge.
Introduction
The defendant (Secretary McHugh) has filed simultaneous motions to dismiss and for summary judgment. Doc. 26. The plaintiff (Mr. Calhoun) has responded, doc. 30, and Secretary McHugh has replied, doc. 44. Mr. Calhoun has also moved to strike some of the Secretary’s submitted evidence. Doc. 29. For the following reasons, the court will:
• treat Secretary McHugh’s motion as one for summary judgment;
*1225• treat Mr. Calhoun’s Motion to Strike as an objection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c)(2);
• GRANT in part…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bloom v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Errickson v. Lakeland Regional Medical Center, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
- Moeinpour v. Board of Trustees of the University of AlabamaDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2025
- Samiullah Ahmadi v. Moises Becerra, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Taylor v. FeldmanDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2022