Aman v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Weltner, Justice.
Peter Paul Aman was convicted for violation of OCGA § 16-12-100 (b) (8), which provides:
It is unlawful for any person knowingly to possess or control any material which depicts a minor engaged in any sexually explicit conduct.
1. (a) Aman contends that under the holding of Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U. S. 557 (89 SC 1243, 22 LE2d 542) (1969), he is not lawfully subject to prosecution for possession of such materials in his own home.
*670(b) In Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U. S. _ (110 SC 1691, 109 LE2d 98) (1990), the United States Supreme Court stated:
[W]e . . . find this case distinct from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Harris v. Entertainment Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989
3Cited by10 opinions
- Phagan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Taylor v. Kennestone Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- State v. Al-KhayyalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Hernandez v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.