Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 8, 2007No. S06A1712PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melton, Justice.

Following his conviction for identity fraud, Nohe Gomes Hernandez appeals, contending, among other things, that the identity fraud statute, OCGA § 16-9-121, is unconstitutionally vague. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the record shows that Hernandez, an illegal immigrant, misappropriated the social security number of Jason Smith. Hernandez then used this misappropriated number to obtain a social security card and a California driver’s license in Smith’s name. Next, posing as Smith, Hernandez used these two pieces of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Hubbard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  5. State v. KlinakisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Castillo-Solis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Gomez-Ramos v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Oluwole Olushola v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API