Legal Opinion

Clark v. Kent Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mandamus by Arthur J. Clark, Charles R. Evarts, and Edwin Evarts, copartners as A. J. Clark & Co., to compel Alfred Wolcott, circuit judge of Kent county, to vacate an order quashing a writ of capias ad respondendum.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Martin Y. Elliott was arrested upon a capias ad respondendum at the suit of the relators, and was duly admitted to bail by the circuit judge as per order indorsed upon the writ. Subsequently, upon motion of Elliott, the respondent made an order vacating his order to hold to bail, and quashing the proceedings, upon the ground that the affidavit attached to the writ was signed and sworn to on the day preceding the day of the date of the writ. A motion was thereupon made by the relators asking the court to set aside said last-mentioned order, but this was denied. Counsel now ask a mandamus to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Watson v. Judge of Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Hale v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Wilson v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Aspell v. HosbeinMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Adams v. HosmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hastings Industrial Co. v. MoranMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. McClanahan v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. People ex rel. McCallum v. GebhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API