Beaufort County v. South Carolina State Election Commission
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Hearn
Respectfully, I concur in part and dissent in part. While I agree with the majority that the plain language of Section 7-11 — 20(B)(2) of the South Carolina Code (Supp.2010) is limited only to the 2008 election cycle, I believe the majority misapplies our precedents concerning appropriations provisos and erroneously concludes Provisos 79.6 and 79.12 suspend this temporal limitation. I would therefore find no requirement that either the State Election Commission or the county *379election commissions conduct the 2012 Presidential Preference Primary.
I note at the outset that this case involves a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- CFRE, LLC v. Greenville County AssessorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Berkebile v. OutenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Joiner Ex Rel. Rivas v. RivasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Buchanan v. State TreasurerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- Plowden v. Beattie, Comptroller GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.