Legal Opinion

Loomis v. City of Union City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 27, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Minturn, J.

My examination of the testimony and the briefs in this case satisfies me that the writ should not go. The writ of certiorari under any circumstances is a discretionary remedy, and where the equities of the case do not warrant it the court is not inclined, as a rule, to grant it. In this case no public convenience will be subserved by granting the writ at this time, in view of the fact that the matter is now before the public utility commissioners for final disposition, and until they shall have disposed of the matter it cannot be said that…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daniel B. Frazier Co. v. Borough of Harvey CedarsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  2. Township of Long Beach v. Daniel B. Frazier Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API