Legal Opinion

Daniel B. Frazier Co. v. Borough of Harvey Cedars

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 27, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J. Lands

of the prosecutor, situate in the respondent municipality, were sold for unpaid taxes amounting to $5,527.29, assessed for the year 1928. The borough was the purchaser. On February 23d, 1932, it filed a bill in Chancery praying the foreclosure of the prosecutor’s right of redemption. The latter, on March 15th, 1932, filed an answer challenging the validity of the sale. This was followed by the present application, on July 7th, 1932, for a writ of certiorari to bring up the proceedings relating to the sale. Pamph. L. 1925, p. 480.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. SalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. People ex rel. Roediger v. Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Daniel B. Frazier Co. v. Township of Long BeachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  4. Inhabitants of Marblehead v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1855
  5. Loomis v. City of Union CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, LONG BEACH TP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API