Legal Opinion

Haagen v. Patton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1960No. Appeal, 73PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

This matter had its inception in an assumpsit action instituted before an alderman in Lancaster County. The plaintiffs, Alexander Haagen and Charlotte Haagen, co-partners doing business as Associated Advertisers, successors to U. S. Buyers’ Report, Inc., sought to recover from Russell A. Patton the sum of $275.00, plus a reasonable attorney’s fee, alleged to be due under a written “Service Agreement”. The alderman entered judgment for the plaintiffs. Upon appeal to the court of common pleas, arbitrators were appointed who also found for the plaintiffs^ Following an appeal…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Furjanick EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Walker v. SaricksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Rosenfeld v. RosenfeldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Chester School District's AuditSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Compass Technology, Inc. v. Tseng Laboratories, Inc., Wang Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Murray v. University of Pennsylvania HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. HashemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Professional & Public Service Employees Union Local 1300 v. TrinisewskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co. v. McNallySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API