Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of McCahill

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 15, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Proceedings upon judicial settlement of the account of an executor. Reargument of exceptions filed by the executor tó the referee’s report.

1Opinion of the Court

Varnum, S.

In this matter Surrogate Arnold made a decision (Surr. Decs., 1898, p. 433) wherein he passed upon the exceptions filed to the referee’s report and construed the clause of the will of decedent that was in dispute. Ho decree was entered upon this decision, and the matter was reargued and submitted to me for final disposition. The clause of the will which the court is asked to construe provides, among other things, that the executors shall invest the shares given to a certain group of nieces of the testator and shall pay the interest earned thereon to said nieces. The will then…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Perkin's EstateNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of HaightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of LeonardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of LeonardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1915
  4. Pfister v. WriterNew York Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API