Musser v. W.L. Fehr
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
This appeal is from the refusal to take off a compulsory non-suit in an action by the holder against the maker of a negotiable promissory note. As the non-suit was entered on the ground that plaintiff’s proofs differ from his allegations, some detailed statement of the case seems necessary. The note, so far as now material, was as follows:
“2,000.00 Pottsville, Pa., July 3rd, 1929.
“Ninety days after date I promise to pay to the order of H. S. Zimmerman two thousand dollars, payable at Miners National Bank without defalcation for value received. William L. Fehr.” It was…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Fehr v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Merrill v. HurleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Dominion Trust Co. v. HildnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Markey v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.