Legal Opinion
Anastasato v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Decided March 6, 1985No. Docket Nos. 14631-81, 14632-81UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
PANO ANASTASATO AND JANICE ANASTASATO, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent; PANMARC, INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Anastasato v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 14631-81, 14632-81.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1985-101; 1985 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 532; 49 T.C.M. (CCH) 893; T.C.M. (RIA) 85101;
March 6, 1985.
Alan H. Levine, for the petitioners.
Jack H. Klinghoffer, for the respondent.
KORNER
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
"KORNER, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined deficiencies in Federal income tax and additions to tax…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Rowlee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- Stone v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DiDonato v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013