Legal Opinion

Hardin County Department of Human Services v. Lamb (In Re Lamb)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 8, 1996No. 15-52703PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND DECISION

RICHARD L. SPEER, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon the filing of dual Motions for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Complaint to Determine Dischargeability of a Debt. The Court has reviewed the arguments, affidavits, and exhibits of the parties, as well as the entire record in the case. Based upon this review and for the following reasons, the Court finds that the Defendant’s debt to Plaintiff is nondischargeable. Accordingly, this Court will grant Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and deny Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

FACT…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Witaschek v. Sacramento County Bureau of Family Support (In Re Witaschek)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API