Birmingham Stove & Range Co. v. Vanderford
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The trial was had upon count A, added by way of amendment. The place of the alleged injury is sufficiently indicated. Gray v. Cooper, 216 Ala. 684, 114 So. 139; Tillery v. Walker, 216 Ala. 676, 114 So. 137; Ruffin C. & T. Co. v. Rich, 214 Ala. 633, 108 So. 596. The averment that said servant, agent, or employee negligently operated said automobile truck at the time and place of collision does not offend the rule declared for good pleading in complaints. Dwight Mfg. Co. v. Holmes, 198 Ala. 590, 73 So. 933; Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co. v. Moore, 194 Ala. 134, 69 So. 540. There was no error in…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Godfrey v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- A. B. C. Truck Lines, Inc. v. KenemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Jones v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Strickland v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Penton v. PentonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Swindall v. SpeignerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.