State v. Bowers
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the Caldwell Circuit Court. — Hon. E. J. Broaddus, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.
This is a prosecution under the druggist and pharmacist statute against defendant who is a druggist, for selling liquor without a prescription required by statute or other requisite authority to do so. The case shows a sale. The defense seems to have been based on a prescription from a regular registered, and practicing physician. This prescription fails to state that the liquor was prescribed as a necessary remedy, as is required by section 4621, Revised Statutes, 1889, and as such is no ■ defense. The trial court did not err in refusing defendant’s instruction declaring the prescription…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Ryan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. HammackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- State v. WillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- State v. ManningMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908