Legal Opinion

State v. Bowers

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Caldwell Circuit Court. — Hon. E. J. Broaddus, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

This is a prosecution under the druggist and pharmacist statute against defendant who is a druggist, for selling liquor without a prescription required by statute or other requisite authority to do so. The case shows a sale. The defense seems to have been based on a prescription from a regular registered, and practicing physician. This prescription fails to state that the liquor was prescribed as a necessary remedy, as is required by section 4621, Revised Statutes, 1889, and as such is no ■ defense. The trial court did not err in refusing defendant’s instruction declaring the prescription…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ryan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State v. HammackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. State v. WillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. State v. ManningMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API