Legal Opinion
Almanza v. Transcontinental Insurance
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided October 2, 1992No. Civ. A. 3:92-CV-1619-HPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SANDERS, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Transcontinental Insurance Co.’s (“Transcontinental”) Motion to Reconsider Remand, filed September 14, 1992.
I. Background
This case began on August 23, 1991, when Transcontinental sued Dorothy C. Al-manza in Texas state court, seeking to set aside an award of the Texas Industrial Accident Board in Almanza’s favor. Al-manza counterclaimed for benefits under the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act. The parties were then automatically realigned.
On July 23, 1992, Almanza filed her Amended Original Petition. In that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Patin v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Patin v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Hanna v. Fleetguard, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
- Walker v. Health Benefit Management Cost Containment, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1994
- Warner v. Crum & Forster Commercial InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.