Legal Opinion

Warner v. Crum & Forster Commercial Insurance

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided December 20, 1993No. 3:93-cv-00641PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

McBRYDE, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion of plaintiff, Kerry Steven Warner, to remand this action to the state court of Texas from which it was removed by defendant, United States Fire Insurance Company. 1 The court has. determined that the motion to remand should be denied.

I

Nature and History of Litigation

The action was instituted in a district court of the State of Texas by a petition in which plaintiff alleged that defendant issued a policy of insurance that provided worker’s compensation benefits for plaintiffs employer, that plaintiff suffered an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harold v. Beighley v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. Vail v. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Bedell v. H.R.C. Ltd.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1981
  4. Haines v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1993
  5. Almanza v. Transcontinental InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Patin v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Patin v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. Hanna v. Fleetguard, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  4. Walker v. Health Benefit Management Cost Containment, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1994
  5. Ortiz v. Brownsville Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API