Legal Opinion
People v. Duke
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 26, 2001No. 99CA0544PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DAILEY.
Defendant, Casey Wade Duke, appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Crim. P. 35(b) and 85(c). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for additional proceedings.
Defendant was charged with one count of criminal mischief for considerably damaging an automobile with a hammer a few weeks before his 18th birthday. Pursuant to § 19-2-517, C.R.S.2000, he was prosecuted in district court because he had twice before been adjudicated a juvenile delinquent.
Pefendant pled guilty in exchange for a community corrections…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. HolmesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. MunseyColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. DunlapColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. KellingColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Close v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- People v. FinneyColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.