Harrison v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Whitman, Judge.
1. The State’s motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the designation of the judgment appealed from lacks specificity is not meritorious. While the notice designates a judgment of conviction and sentence entered November 9, 1968, and the record reveals that the judgment of conviction and sentence was in fact entered November 8, 1968, which would have required dismissal under the rulings made in Walker v. Walker, 222 Ga. 521 (150 SE2d 635) and Bowers v. Gill, 222 Ga. 529 (150 SE2d 653), the amendment of 1968 to the Appellate Practice Act (Ga. L. 1968, p. 1072, et seq.),…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Whippler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Patton v. Bank of LaFayetteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Anderson v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Worthy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Corvair Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. BullCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Prothro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Grayer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Bagwell v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.