Bagwell v. Henson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
The fact that the notice of appeal is improperly styled is not ground for dismissal. Franklin v. Sea Island Bank, 120 Ga. App. 654 (1) (171 SE2d 866). Nor will the fact that the judgment appealed from is designated as having been dated October 15, 1970, be held insufficient because such judgment was entered on October 22. Harrison v. State, 120 Ga. App. 812 (172 SE2d 328); Code Ann. § 6-809 (d). The motions to dismiss are denied.
The main thrust of the appeal is that the option to repurchase in the bill of sale is void as against the rule against perpetuities because it does not…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kershner v. HurlburtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Turner v. PeacockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Hughes v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Fletcher v. FletcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Wadley Lumber Co. v. LottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nationsbank, N.A. v. Southtrust Bank of Georgia, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Bond v. Peabody Coal Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Leone Hall Price Foundation v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Smith v. StuckeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Jackson v. Southern Pan & Shoring Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.