Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Jackson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from tbe ebancery court of Wilkinson county. Hon. E. W. Cutler, Chancellor. Suits by Clarissa Jackson and others and Lucile Dickson and others against the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

Appellant prosecutes this appeal from decrees of the chancery court of Wilkinson county rendered against it as surety on the bond of Hattie Jackson, guardian of Clarissa, James, and William Jackson, minors, and also on the bond of Annette Dickson, guardian of Lucile and Modess Dickson, minors. The two cases were by agreement tried together in the court below, and are presented to us in the form of one record. There is no material controversy about the facts in the case. It appears that Hattie Jackson and her three minor children, just mentioned, were each to receive one thousand, five hundred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. Joseph A. Lum & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  2. Bonner v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Minter v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  4. State ex rel. Garesché v. SlevinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Ely v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atwood v. Hicks by HicksMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Davis v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Newsom v. Fed. Land Bk. of N.O.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Anthony v. National Bank of CommerceMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Brewer v. HerronMississippi Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API