Legal Opinion

Ely v. Hawkins

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1860PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Bartholomew Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPersists, J.

Ely and Miller were sued on the bond given by the former, as guardian. The bond was joint in form, but joint and several in legal effect, under the statute of Indiana.

Ely had not, at the commencement of the suit, nor does it appear that he yet has, been removed from his office of guardian.

It was alleged, for breach of the bond, that he had failed to return inventories, and to apply the trust funds, as required by statute.

On appearing to the suit below, the defendants moved to dismiss it; the Court took the motion under advisement till near the close of the term, when, out of Court, the judge…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peck v. BramanIndiana Supreme Court · 1828

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Preston v. Sandford's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Traders Insurance v. CarpenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Dillon v. BessantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API