Legal Opinion

People v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 2006No. H029672PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, Acting P. J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Timothy Desmond Miller entered into a negotiated plea agreement in which he pleaded no contest to one felony count in each of three drug offense cases in exchange for an aggregate sentence of either six years or six years eight months. The length of the aggregate term was to be determined by the trial court at the time of sentencing. The trial court chose the longer aggregate sentence of six years eight months pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.1.

On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court failed to exercise its…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. ButtramCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Nguyen v. CalhounCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. People v. FelixCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re CanadyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. People v. Avila CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. People v. Chapa CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. Davidson CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. Jackson CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API