Legal Opinion

Armour & Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1937No. 24162. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiep Justice Farthing

delivered the opinion of the court:

An arbitrator, the Industrial Commission and the superior court of Cook county found that Henrietta Holmes was entitled to compensation on account of the death of her husband, John Holmes, which occurred June 23, 1935. The cause is here by writ of error.

On February 10, 1935, John Holmes and his employer, Armour and Company, were operating under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation act. Holmes had worked in the refrigerating plant of that company for several years as an engineer. He went to work at 11 :oo o’clock Saturday…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Haiselden v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Consumers Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Burns v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Raymond v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Quaker Oats Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Jefferson Ice Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Salt Lake City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Grola v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Crane Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API