Legal Opinion
Baust v. New York State Division of Human Rights
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 4, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Tait, J.), entered October 23, 2008 in Tioga County, which granted petitioners’ applications, in two proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 and Executive Law § 298, to annul two determinations of respondent State Division of Human Rights dismissing petitioners’ discrimination complaints for lack of jurisdiction.
Petitioners’ employer, respondent BioLife Solutions, Inc., terminated their employment. They commenced actions in Supreme Court alleging breach of their employment contracts, among other things, and seeking damages from BioLife. Several…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goosley v. Binghamton City School District Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Bright v. McGowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Gondola v. Center Moriches Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- State Commission for Human Rights v. LieberNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Maloff v. City Commission on Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stoudymire v. N.Y.S. Division of Human RightsNew York Supreme Court · 2012
- KEN-VIL ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERS v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN, RIGHTSAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Ken-Vil Associates Ltd. Partnership v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Ken-Vil Associates Ltd. Partnership v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012