Legal Opinion

Packer v. Fairmont Creamery Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1944No. 35,943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*581OPINION ON REHEARING

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, C. J.:

This is a rehearing. The case has been rebriefed and reargued, but our original statement of facts and the jury’s general and special' findings as set forth in ante, p. 191, 146 P. 2d 401, need not be repeated.

Considering once again whether finding No. 14 and the special findings which supplement it, No. 10 and No. 12, should compel judgment for defendant notwithstanding the general verdict, a majority of this court holds otherwise. It reasons thus: The jury .found that defendant’s negligence lay in failure to apply…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Myers v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Orr v. HensySupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Packer v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nunez v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. St. Clair v. St. ClairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Murphy v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  4. DeTunno v. ShullOhio Supreme Court · 1957
  5. St. Clair v. St. ClairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API