Legal Opinion

DeTunno v. Shull

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1957No. Nos. 34833 and 34834Published

1Opinion of the CourtHeubeet, J.

The facts as to the circumstances which led 1 the minor’s alleged injuries are undisputed and are well summe up as follows in the opinion of the Court of Appeals:

“The automobile in which the minor was a passenger in th rear seat, while stopped for a traffic light, was struck in the real by the automobile driven by the defendant. Defendant admittel that the car in which the minor was a passenger was stoppe< by traffic; that defendant had had some beer and pleaded guilt; to a charge of operating his motor vehicle under the influenc of liquor.”

In the minor’s case, the defendant raises three…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Birmingham Amusement Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Wash., B. A.R. Co. v. KimmeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  3. Girratono v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Hoffman v. KnollmanOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Carangelo v. Nutmeg Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API