Legal Opinion
DeTunno v. Shull
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1957No. Nos. 34833 and 34834Published
1Opinion of the CourtHeubeet, J.
The facts as to the circumstances which led 1 the minor’s alleged injuries are undisputed and are well summe up as follows in the opinion of the Court of Appeals:
“The automobile in which the minor was a passenger in th rear seat, while stopped for a traffic light, was struck in the real by the automobile driven by the defendant. Defendant admittel that the car in which the minor was a passenger was stoppe< by traffic; that defendant had had some beer and pleaded guilt; to a charge of operating his motor vehicle under the influenc of liquor.”
In the minor’s case, the defendant raises three…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Birmingham Amusement Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Wash., B. A.R. Co. v. KimmeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
- Girratono v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Hoffman v. KnollmanOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Carangelo v. Nutmeg Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.