Legal Opinion

Cabiness v. City of Tuscaloosa

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1958No. 6 Div. 593PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge.

Ordinance No. 583, as amended, of the City of Tuscaloosa, under which defendant was convicted, provides, inter alia, “that it shall be unlawful for any person to sell, have, keep ■ or expose or offer for sale, for human consumption, any meat or meat products, unless same shall have been slaughtered in accordance with the regulations of this ordinance, in a licensed slaughter house holding a permit from the City of Tuscaloosa, and shall have been duly inspected, passed and stamped or tagged by the City Meat Inspector; provided, however, that this shall not apply to meat…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex parte CowertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Holt v. Mayor of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Mitchell v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Snellings v. JonesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. City of Birmingham v. WestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gober v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Knight v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API