Legal Opinion

Hosta v. Chrysler

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 2007No. 2007 CA 26PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolff, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Elizabeth Hosta, Susan Chrysler, Roy Baker, and Marion Brooks (“plaintiffs”) appeal from a decision of the Greene County Court of Common Pleas, which denied their motion to enforce an injunction issued during the pendency of their case against Jack Chrysler and William Chrysler (“defendants”). For the following reasons, the decision is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

{¶ 2} Upon review of the record, the relevant history of this litigation is as follows.

{¶ 3} The parties are purported shareholders or directors of Kil-Kare, Inc., a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zakany v. ZakanyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Gibson Guitar Corp. v. Paul Reed Smith Guitars, LpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. Burns v. DailyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Rice v. McGrathOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. American Motors Corp. v. HuffstutlerOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Emanuel's, L.L.C. v. Restore Marietta, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. Cashelmara Condominium Unit Owners Assn., Inc. v. KishOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Toledo v. OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State ex rel. Pitstick v. HastingsOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. Grand Voiture d'Ohio Societe des 40 et 8 v. Montgomery Cty. Voiture No. 34 la Societe 40 et 8Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API