Legal Opinion
Miller v. Gold Beach Packing Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 18, 1929PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEossman, J.
The controlling issues are (1) whether the covenant of the lease quoted in the preceding statement required the tenant to rebuild the structure in event it was destroyed by fire; (2) whether a tenant, who procures a policy of insurance for the full value of the building and who, upon the latter’s destruction, collects insurance money in an amount representing the value of the two estates in the building, may retain only such portion of it as represents the value of his estate and must account to the remainderman for the balance.
To support their argument that the clause of the lease previously…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brownell v. Board of Education of Inside Tax District of City of Saratoga SpringsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Strong v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Thompson v. GearheartSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Spellman v. Lincoln Rapid Transit Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Van Wormer v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Alexander v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Haskin v. GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Gorman's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Transportation Equipment Rentals, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Yoshida v. Security InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.