Legal Opinion

Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. Ramey

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1891PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the. Fourth District;— heard in that court on- appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair, county; the Hon. William H. Snyder, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

This is an action for negligence in constructing and maintaining an embankment for a railroad track over the bottom .lands bordering a water-course, whereby water that would otherwise have flowed away was backed and thrown upon lands possessed by the plaintiff, and his crops growing thereon were damaged. The defendant pleaded not guilty, and upon 'the trial endeavored to prove that the backing of the water ■upon the lands possessed by the plaintiff and doing the injury complained of was caused by an.extraordinary rainfall.

At the request of the defendant the court submitted the following…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mayor of New-York v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1845
  2. Gray v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Davis v. Ivey and EstesSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Town of Jefferson v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. ThillmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Hecht v. Boston Wharf Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. Reichert v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API