Legal Opinion

Plymouth Builders, Inc. v. Village of Lindenhurst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 11, 1954PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from so much of a judgment in favor of respondent as directed the dismissal of the second cause of action, which sought a judgment declaring that respondent’s zoning ordinance was unconstitutional and void insofar as it affected certain lots owned by appellant Plymouth Builders, Inc. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The second cause of action was erroneously dismissed on the ground that appellant owner, having purchased the property with knowledge of the zoning restriction, was precluded from questioning the validity thereof. (Vernon Park Realty v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Shepard v. Village of SkaneatelesNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Vernon Park Realty, Inc. v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Ulmer Park Realty Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  5. Ulmer Park Realty Company v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Le BoeufNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Susquehanna Development, L. L. C. v. Assessor of the City of BinghamtonNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Chusud Realty Corp. v. Village of KensingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Fitzgerald v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  5. Stevens v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API