Legal Opinion

Thomassen v. West St. Louis Water & Light Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 22, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendants for damages in the sum of $3,000 for the killing of her husband, which, on appeal to the St. Louis Court of Appeals, was affirmed by the majority opinion as against the defendant Frederick Miller, and reversed as to the defendant the West St. Louis Water Light Company. One of the judges deeming the decision of the majority reversing the judgment against the corporate defendant, contrary to the decisions of this court, the case was accordingly certified and transferred to this court, as required by Section 6 of the Amendment of 1884 to our…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hilsdorf v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  2. Barry v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
  3. Fink v. Missouri Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  4. Gayle v. Missouri Car & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. Morgan v. BowmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mallory v. Louisiana Pure Ice & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Coul v. George B. Peck Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Baker v. Scott County Milling Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. Hoelker v. American PressSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. Dagley v. National Cloak & Suit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API