Legal Opinion

Coul v. George B. Peck Dry Goods Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 1, 1930PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. Upon a trial to a jury the court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff's evidence and instructed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant. A verdict was returned in conformity with the instruction, and from the judgment entered thereon the plaintiff has appealed.

The defendant in the operation of a retail store in Kansas City maintained a department for the delivery of goods to its patrons. Regular and extra drivers were employed by it to make its deliveries. The regular drivers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGrath v. City of St. Louis & Heman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Hoelker v. American PressSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  3. Thomassen v. West St. Louis Water & Light Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Maltz v. Jackoway-Katz Cap Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Skidmore Ex Rel. Skidmore v. HaggardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Smith Bros., Inc. v. O'BryanTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Ballinger v. Gascosage Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  5. Rutherford v. Tobin Quarries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API