City of Mission v. Eureka Fire Hose Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action for money alleged to be due on two contracts by the appellant to appellee. The contracts for the purchase of the hose were attached to and made part of the petition. The cause was tried before the court, without a jury, and judgment rendered for $1,499.10, together with interest from the date of the judgment, December 14, 1932.
It is not denied by appellant that the hose described in the petition was furnished by appellee to appellant, and no complaint is made of the kind or quality of the hose furnished, and the evidence tends to show that it was received and used by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sluder v. City of San AntonioTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- City of San Antonio v. FrenchTexas Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by14 opinions
- B. L. Nelson & Associates, Inc. v. City of ArgyleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Waller County v. FreeloveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Panhandle Const. Co. v. City of SpearmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- City of Floydada v. American La France & Foamite Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- City of Breckenridge v. StokerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.