Legal Opinion

Norris v. Haverhill

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 5, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBingham, J.

The objection is taken that tbe laying out of tbe highway was void, because no sufficient terminus was specified as a starting-point in the petition. To avoid unnecessary expense and delay, objections to the form of a petition for a highway should be made, as a general rule, at the first opportunity. This objection being to the form of the petition, and not seasonably taken, was waived. Bacheler v. New Hampton, 60 N. H. 207.

The defendants claimed at the trial that the plaintiff, on the facts in the case, was not a traveller on the highway at the time of the accident, and requested the court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dearborn v. NewhallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
  2. Bacheler v. New HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Turon v. J. & L. CONSTRUCTION CO.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. Caldwell v. YeatmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
  4. Winslow v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906
  5. Chickering v. LordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API