Norstrand v. Little
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
Washington requires every public employee to subscribe to an oath that he is “not a subversive person or a member of the Communist Party or any subversive organization, foreign or otherwise, which engages in or advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the overthrow, destruction or alteration of the constitutional form of the government of the United States, or of the State of Washington, or of any political subdivision of either of them, by revolution, force or violence; . . Refusal so to do “on any *475grounds shall be cause for immediate termination of such employee’s employment.” *
Appellants…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Williams v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- City of Seattle v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1959
3Cited by25 opinions
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Socialist Labor Party v. GilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connell v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bozic v. U.S. Dist. Court for the S. Dist. of Cal.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Cole v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.