Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Ross

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1959No. 34792PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

The appellant was charged in municipal court with a violation of Seattle ordinance No. 40149-9a, as amended by ordinance No. 86061-1, which became effective on or about May 4, 1957, and has not been heretofore construed. The' provision under which the appellant was charged, tried and found guilty, reads;

“It is unlawful for anyone not lawfully authorized to frequent, enter, be in, or be found in, any place where narcotics, narcotic drugs or their derivatives are unlawfully used, kept or disposed of.”

On appeal to the superior court, the appellant waived jury trial. According to the memorandum…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Manley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Patton v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. LundquistWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. King County v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. City of Tacoma v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Western Petroleum Importers, Inc. v. FriedtWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API