Legal Opinion
Mott v. Federal Election Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 30, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-3375PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Stewart Mott, Patricia Stahlman, and the National Conservative Political Action Committee (NCPAC) have brought this suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and its members. They allege that certain provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, (FECA), FEC regulations, and FEC advisory opinions and opinions letters are unconstitutionally overbroad and vague both on their face and as applied because they interfere with plaintiffs’ ability to make certain…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- California Water Service Co. v. City of ReddingSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Green v. Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Martin Tractor Company v. Federal Election Commission National Chamber Alliance for Politics v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- California Medical Ass'n v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michael R. Goland v. United States of America, and Federal Election Commission, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Bread Political Action Committee v. The Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Libertarian National Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Common Cause v. SchmittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.