Libertarian National Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Libertarian National Committee, Inc. (“LNC”) has been left a bequest that it is unable to take in one lump sum payment because Defendant Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) believes that, due to the large amount of the bequest, to do so would violate the Federal Election Campaign Act, 2 U.S.C. §§ 431-57. The FEC instead requires, as they have for decades, that the LNC receive annual payments from the bequest at the maximum contribution amount a living individual could donate. Thus the LNC will receive the full bequest, but over a…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Libertarian National Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Holmes v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Libertarian Nat'l Comm., Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Libertarian Nat'l Comm., Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Libertarian National Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.