Koepplin v. PFISTER HYBRID COMPANY OF FREMONT
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
This is an action by Walter A. Koepplin on his written contract of employment with the Pfister Hybrid Company of Fremont, Nebraska, praying for the reformation of the contract and an accounting of the amounts due thereon. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the trial court sustained a motion to dismiss for insufficiency of the evidence to establish a cause of action. The plaintiff has appealed.
The organization of the defendant company grew out of the following circumstances: In 1939, Pfister Associated Growers was organized in the State of Illinois. Each stockholder of the corporation had a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lortscher v. WinchellNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
- Omaha Wool & Storage Co. v. Chicago Great Western RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by4 opinions
- VAL-U CONST. CO. OF SD v. Contractors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- SMS TRUCKING COMPANY v. Midland Vet, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1971
- Westhaven Properties, Inc. v. PahlNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Cheshire County Convention v. Cheshire County CommissionersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975