Legal Opinion
Atteberry v. Barclays Bank PLC (In Re Atteberry)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas
Decided November 12, 1992No. 19-40023PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER FINDING PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER DEFENDANT BUT DISMISSING FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS
JAMES A. PUSATERI, Bankruptcy Judge.
This proceeding is before the Court on the motion of defendant Barclays Bank PLC (Barclays) to dismiss for improper service of process, lack of personal jurisdiction, or forum non conveniens. Barclays appears by counsel N. Larry Bork. Plaintiff Donald G. Atteberry, DVM, P.A. (Atte-berry), appears by counsel J.B. King. The Court has reviewed the pleadings and is now ready to rule.
FACTS
The following facts are uncontroverted. Atteberry’s president negotiated a contract…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Lubin Quinones v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Company, Lubin Quinones v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Company, Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff v. William G. Mowad, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Atteberry v. Barclays Bank PLC (In Re Atteberry)District Court, D. Kansas · 1993