Legal Opinion
Kenneth W. Guenther and Marva Guenther v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 14, 1989No. 88-7244PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
We are sufficiently troubled by allegations that Commissioner’s counsel improperly made an ex parte communication which prejudiced the trial judge’s disposition of this case that we defer review of the merits and instead order this temporary remand.
I
Kenneth and Marva Guenther (individually “Kenneth” and “Marva” and collectively “taxpayers”) were husband and wife during 1978 and 1979 and filed joint income tax returns for both years. 1 In auditing these returns, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) uncovered alleged errors resulting in issuance of a Notice of Deficiency. Taxpayers filed a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Elsie Simer v. Richard J. Rios, Acting Director of Community Services Administration Community Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Clyde Major Thompson, AKA Clyde JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Paul Skulsky, and Marc Pozner, Appeal of Paul Skulsky, in No. 85-5123. Appeal of Marc Pozner, in No. 85-5124Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- William Ludwig v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Brandon Austin v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- In Re Silicon Graphics, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997
- United States v. Robert Douglas TreadwayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Seidel v. Durkin (In Re Goodwin)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.