McDermid v. McGregor
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action for specific performance. The defendant Austin demurred to the complaint; the defendant McGregor answered ; and the issues of fact were tried before llameóme, J., without a jury, resulting' in a judgment for the defendant McGregor, from which the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
The return on file in this appeal contains-what appear to be minutes of testimony taken by the court or clerk below, but no- settled case. The paper book contains what purports to be a settled case, which is not found in the return, and which not only does not assume to contain all the evidence received, but in fact omits much important matter found in the minutes of testimony, and, as we infer from the findings, much that was considered by the-court below. Under these circumstances, it is not for this court to enquire whether the findings of fact are justified by the evidence, but only…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Combs v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Quarton v. American Law Book Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Dehuy v. OsborneSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Colstad v. LevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.