Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Kato

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 21, 2007No. 05-1240PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

127 S.Ct. 1091 (2007)

Andre WALLACE, Petitioner,

v.

Kristen KATO et al.

No. 05-1240.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 6, 2006.

Decided February 21, 2007.

Kenneth N. Flaxman, Chicago, IL, for petitioner.

Benna Ruth Solomon, Chicago, IL, for respondents.

Kenneth N. Flaxman, Counsel of Record, Chicago, Illinois, John J. Bursch, Warner Norcross & Judd LLP, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Petitioner.

Lawrence Rosenthal Chapman University School of Law, Orange, California, of Counsel, Mara S. Georges, Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago, Benna Ruth Solomon, Counsel of Record, Deputy…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Scalia; Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Duane Belanus v. Phil ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. (PC) Coleman v. VirgaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. (PC) De'Armond, Jr. v. WhiteDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (PC) Goods v. BaughmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. (PC) Humes v. Roseville Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API