Legal Opinion

Dunton v. Ayscue

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 2010No. COA09-1242PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Robert C., Judge.

Plaintiff Charles Dunton appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing his complaint pursuant to the “two dismissal” rule under Rule 41(a)(1), as well as Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff primarily argues that the trial court erred in dismissing his complaint because defendant Angela Michelle Ayscue was never served in the two prior actions and thus the “two dismissal” rule should not operate as a bar to his current cause of action against defendant. We conclude, based on prior precedent and the plain language of Rule 41(a)(1),…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Masters v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Graham v. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Carter Ex Rel. Carter v. ClowersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. City of Raleigh v. College Campus Apartments, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Richardson v. McCracken EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lifestore Bank v. Mingo Tribal Preservation TrustCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. Gentry v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. Chisum v. MacDonaldNorth Carolina Business Court · 2018
  4. Eq. Tr. Co. v. S&R GrandviewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API