Legal Opinion

United States v. Birdinground

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 24, 2008No. 06-30658PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*540MEMORANDUM **

Clifford G. Birdinground appeals from the district court’s decision, following limited remands under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), and United States v. Montgomery, 462 F.3d 1067, 1069 (9th Cir.2006), that his previously imposed sentence would not be different under the advisory Guidelines. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Birdinground raises unpreserved challenges to his original sentence and also argues that the district court was biased and did not sufficiently consider the sentencing factors set forth…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Robert F. CombsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Bert Douglas MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michael R. Spengler v. Pomona Superior Court of L.A. CountyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API