Legal Opinion
Malta Construction Co. v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided April 28, 1989No. 1:86-CV-2029-RHHPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT H. HALL, District Judge.
This action is currently before the court on (1) Henningson, Durham & Richardson Inc.’s (HDR) motion to strike Contention 11 of the Pretrial Order, (2) HDR’s motion to strike plaintiff’s claim for prejudgment interest and (3) YSL Corporation’s (YSL) motion in limine. For the reasons stated below, the court GRANTS HDR’s motion to strike Contention 11, GRANTS HDR’s motion to strike plaintiff's claim for prejudgment interest and GRANTS VSL’s motion in limine.
FACTS
(The facts of the case are set out in this court’s order of June 2, 1987 and will not be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Robert & Company Associates v. Rhodes-Haverty PartnershipSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Braner v. Southern Trust InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Marathon Oil Co. v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Ryan v. Progressive Retailer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- International Indemnity Co. v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Abrams & Wofsy v. Renaissance Inv. Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1993
- FIRST SOLAR ELECTRIC LLC v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2025
- Malta Construction v. HenningsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991