Legal Opinion

State v. Lovegren

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 11, 1990No. 890350-CAPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

After losing a critical motion to suppress, defendants each entered a conditional guilty plea to one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, a second degree felony, under Utah Code Ann. § 58-37-8(l)(a)(iv) (1988). See State v. Sery, 758 P.2d 935, 939 (Utah Ct.App.1988) (upholding conditional guilty pleas). On appeal, defendants challenge the trial court’s decision denying their motion to suppress. We remand for more detailed findings.

FACTS

On June 18,1988, a Utah highway patrolman was traveling southbound on Interstate 15 near Spanish Fork.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose Luis Guzman and Sonia Cruz-LazoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. State v. ArroyoUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. Acton v. DeliranUtah Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. LopezUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. West Valley City v. Majestic Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  4. World Peace Movement of America v. Newspaper Agency Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. BoboCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API