Ryan v. Martin
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
in Equity. Separate demurrers by defendants, Tom Moore Gold Mining Company and Arthur B. Lewis, to bill of complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
The demurrers challenge the sufficiency of
the complaint in two regards: (1) The Tom Moore Gold Mining Company says that several separate and distinct and independent matters are involved and charged with which it has no concern and in which it ought not,to be implicated; (3) that complainant has not complied with rule 91 of Equity Practice; and (3) that complainant has not stated facts entitling him to any of the relief demanded; and Lewis saj-s that complainant has not stated any such case as entitles him to any such relief as is demanded in the bill.
The complainant,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Venner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Kennedy v. HazeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hepburn and Dundas's Heirs v. Dunlop & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1816
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Velsicol Corp. v. HymanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1951
- Cattell v. JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
- Magg v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924